 08-11-2005, 5:03 PM
|
Reefer
 
Joined on 02-10-2005
Κάπου πάρα πολύ όμορφος για καθέναν αλλά με.
Posts 105
|
|
|
Ayn has nothing to do with competent thought, and my conclusion that
groups are nonsense. Absolutely no community is necessary.
When communities are created certain concessions must be made, certain
compromises if you will. I compromise nothing and belong to no
community, save the technical definition describing the place in which
I reside.
My principles are my own and I don't need a bunch of simpleton rable-rousers to tell me that I should move this way, or that.
"Who wants to own a company with just one employee?"
-This logic is flawed. You don't want a company with one
employee, but a company with many employees doing exactly what you
ask. More people can get more done, when told what to do, but too
many chiefs and not enough Indians leads to a "group" in the context in
which I was using it, thus quality is
sacrificed. If you put several reasonably competent heads
together, all you end up with is crap-soup. If one person makes
a decision, and every other cog and wheel does it's job, the product is complete, and most importantly, uncompromising.
But back to groups, in the context of religion, politics, philosophy,
or even "straight edge", it's all nonsense. Just like those little
goth idiots you used to see in high school, Mike phrased it well, "just
a group of individuals."
Pointless hacks.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|